MINUTES of BRANCH ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING
held on 14 MARCH 2005 in the
CITY CHAMBERS, HIGH STREET, EDINBURGH
(Meeting of
21 February was inquorate)
The meeting was chaired by the Branch Chairperson,
Barbara Foubister.
1. OPENING REMARKS/ INTRODUCTIONS
The Chair gave a briefing on the pensions campaign.
2.APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS
Four Scrutineers were appointed
3.STANDING ORDERS
The Branch Standing Orders were AGREED for the
following year.
4. MINUTES OF AGM 2005
The minutes of the last Branch Annual General
meeting of 23rd February 2004 were AGREED as a correct record
with no matters arising.
5. ANNUAL REPORT
No questions were raised on the Annual Report.
6. FINANCIAL STATEMENT
The meeting AGREED the financial statements.
7. SPECIAL REPORTS
Emergency Motion: The Service Conditions Co-ordinator
appraised the meeting on Council proposals for the implementation
of Job Evaluation and their desire to use a scheme different
to that negotiated through the Scottish Joint Council.
An Emergency Motion was tabled and received
the required support to be submitted to the Agenda.
Following the Service Conditions Co-ordinator's
report the Emergency Motion was debated and CARRIED unanimously.
The terms of the motion were as follows:
Job Evaluation Developments
Proposed John Stevenson (Social Work) and
John Mulgrew (LVJB)
In light of the Council's proposals to apply
the Greater London Provincial Council Job Evaluation Scheme
as opposed to the Scheme negotiated through the Scottish Joint
Council this branch agrees that Branch Officers should
- explore the details of both schemes
- seek advice from UNISON Scotland Local Government
- provide a report on the pros and cons of each scheme
Branch Officers should bring forward recommendations
to a future Special General Meeting of the branch and to initiate
a ballot of the Branch Membership if required.
The meeting also received a report from the
Service Conditions Convener (APT&C) on the Government
proposals for pension changes. On the advice of the Chairperson
it was AGREED Motion 14 and relevant amendments would be taken
at this point of the meeting.
Motion 14 - Pensions
Proposed John Ross (Housing) and John Stevenson
(Social Work)
This Branch condemns Government proposals to
change the Pension Regulations with the effect of
1. Raising the age for early retirement from
50 to 55, and
2. Reducing pension levels of any member of
the superannuation scheme taking retirement before the
age of 65 (excepting ill-health retirals).
We believe these attacks on pensions will lead
to higher levels of poverty amongst those retiring in the
future.
We welcome UNISON's role in leading the TUC's
campaign against these proposals.
This meeting agrees to support all initiatives
within the TUC's campaign up to and including strike action.
We also instruct Branch Officers to target a
local campaign on this issue with MPs and MSPs throughout
the Lothian's being the focus. This campaign should be with
the involvement of the full branch membership.
Amendment to Motion 14 - Pensions
Proposed Irene Stout (Culture & Leisure)
and Amanda Kerr (Culture & Leisure)
We welcome the overwhelming vote for a programme
of action beginning with a day of Strike Action on Wednesday
23rd March and call upon all members to take part in picketing
duties at their workplace followed by participation in the
March and Rally scheduled to take place in Edinburgh on that
day.
We note the ongoing dialogue between the Deputy
Prime Minister and the unions on the proposed pension changes
and call upon the government to withdraw their proposals and
to enter into meaningful dialogue with a view to defining
what the issues are and then to address them in partnership
rather than imposition.
Following debate the motion as amended was CARRIED
unanimously.
8. ELECTION OF BRANCH OFFICERS
The undernoted were elected unopposed:
President:Joe Galletta
Chairperson: Barbara Foubister (Education)
Vice-Chairperson Matthew Creighton (City Development)
Lyn Williams (Social Work)
Secretary: John Stevenson (Social Work)
Assistant Secretary: Agnes Petkevicius (Education)
Treasurer: Mike McCrossan (Housing)
Service Conditions Co-ordinator: John Mulgrew (LVJB)
Service Conditions Convener (APT&C): John Ross (Housing)
Service Conditions Convener (Craft): Walter Weir (City Dev)
Service Conditions Convener (Manual): George Lee (Social Work)
Health & Safety Officer: Tom McLeod (City Dev)
Equalities Officer: Irene Stout (Culture & Leisure)
Education Officer: No nomination received
Communications Officer: John Stevenson (Social Work)
Welfare Officer: (Job-Share) Gillian Allan (LVJB) Mike
Smith (Finance)
International Officer:Matthew Creighton
Service Conditions Officers (4): (at least two must be women)
Kevin Duguid (Finance)
Agnes Petkevicius (Education)
Elaine Wishart (Social Work)
Recruitment/Membership Officer: Irene Heggie (Finance)
Lifelong Learning Officer: Dot Paterson (Social Work)
No nominations were received for the post of
Young Members Officer. Nominations will continue to be sought
via the Branch Committee for this post.
9. RULE CHANGES
The Chair advised the meeting the rule change
requires a two-thirds majority to be passed and if passed
will come into operation for the 2006 AGM.
Rules B and H Election of Branch Officers
Proposed John Stevenson (Social Work) and
John Ross (Housing)
Rule B.1a): Delete "There will be an Annual
General Meeting of the Branch to elect branch officers"
and insert "There will be an annual General meeting of
the Branch to receive a report on the ballot for election
of branch officers and to confirm election to uncontested
posts."
Standing Order H.6 Delete: "Election of
Branch Officers," and insert "Report of any Ballot
for Election of the following Branch Officers and confirm
election to uncontested posts."
Standing Order H.21: Add the following: "Ballot
papers for any contested posts will be sent to all members
with the Annual Report. The closing date for return shall
be three working days before the date of the AGM. Ballot papers
will be counted by branch office staff and the result reported
to the AGM. All ballot papers will be retained for 28 days
to allow examination by any candidate.
NOTE: The effect of these rule changes would
be to elect branch officers annually by postal ballot rather
than by ballot at the AGM itself.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the Rule
Change did NOT achieve the required two-thirds majority
10. POLICY MOTIONS
The meeting AGREED the suggested priority order
of business reflecting the need for an AGM decision and the
urgency of the matter.
Motion 1 - Tsunami Disaster Appeal
Proposed by John Stevenson (Social Work)
and John Ross (Housing)
This Branch meeting supports the actions of
the Branch Committee in making a donation of £5,000 to the
Disaster Emergency Committee's Appeal following the Tsunami
disaster.
We note the National Executive Committee has
called for specific donations towards assisting the Trade
Union movement re-establish itself during the economic recovery
of East Asia and agree a further branch donation of £2,000
for this purpose.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
Motion 15 - Industrial Action Fund
Proposed by John Ross (Housing) and John
Stevenson (Social Work)
In accordance with Branch Rule D (12) (1) this
Annual General Meeting agrees to transfer 10% of Branch Remission
for 2004 from the General Account to the Industrial Action
Fund (i.e. the Branch Hardship Fund).
(Branch Rule (12) (1)
It shall be funded by money transferred from
the General Fund as agreed by the Branch from time to time
limited to no more than 10% of branch remission in any one
year, from donations or fund-raising activities and from any
levy agreed by the branch under National Rules.)
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
Motion 16 - Industrial Action Fund
Proposed by John Ross (Housing) and John
Stevenson (Social Work)
This Branch meeting instructs Branch Officers
to seek the agreement of the National Executive Council that
this Branch can put in place a membership levy of no more
than £1 per month with monies collected going to the Branch
Industrial Action Fund (i.e. Branch Hardship Fund).
Decision: Motion was withdrawn
Motion 2 - Stock Transfer and the threat
to service condition in Housing
Proposed by Housing Department shop Stewards
Committee
In order to secure funding from the Scottish
Executive the Council has decided to promote the transfer
of the entire housing stock to a new Housing Association.
The final decision will be taken by Council tenants who will
vote in 2006 either for or against the transfer proposals.
While recognising that investment is badly needed
this branch rejects that position for the following reasons:
Stock Transfer means privatisation of an essential
public service and democratic control and accountability through
elected councillors will be lost.
Post transfer there may be threats to terms
and conditions of service as in Glasgow where despite a TUPE
agreement the Glasgow Housing Association has now proposed
annual job cuts of £1.75m and a performance related pay scheme
which will replace both the annual pay award and automatic
progression through the pay increments.
The closure of the Housing Department will also
have a detrimental impact on jobs in other Council Departments
as it buys £4.5m in goods and services from other departments.
Stock Transfer is an expensive option and both
the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee and the National
Audit Office have reported that Stock Transfer results in
higher costs than Council's carrying out housing improvements
themselves.
UNISON believes that the government should provide
an Investment Allowance that would allow Councils to finance
borrowing using the Prudential Borrowing arrangements.
The campaign for a ‘level playing field' in
housing finance and for direct investment in Council housing
is gaining momentum and successfully changed Labour Party
policy at its last National Conference.
This branch therefore resolves to:
1. Defend any members faced with victimisation
for standing by UNISON policy.
2. Seek advice about the legality of management
instructions to members to canvas tenants for the Yes vote
that may mean their transfer out of council employment.
3. Write to all members in the Housing Department
to clarify UNISON's position and seek their views about the
development of the campaign.
4. Apply to UNISON's General Political Fund
for the resources to mount a campaign against Stock Transfer.
5. Write to the Council to insist that the information
given to tenants sets out the case for and against transfer.
6. Affiliate to Edinburgh Against Stock Transfer
which has been set up as a broad campaign to argue the case
for the retention of Council Housing and to campaign for a
No Vote in 2006.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
Motion 3 - Social Work Resource Crisis
Proposed by John Stevenson (Social Work)
and John Ross (Housing)
This Branch condemns the apparent resource crisis
in Social Work services as demonstrated in the recruitment
freeze and lack of funds for delivering client services especially
in community care.
It condemns reports that the £100,000 emergency
money voted by the council to address issues in the External
Audit of Child Protection has apparently been withdrawn.
This branch regrets that the funding crisis
in Social Work only got widespread recognition in the aftermath
of a tragedy. It is deeply concerned that funding cuts seem
to have been re-initiated after the glare of publicity has
passed.
This branch therefore resolves to:
- maintain its campaign at local and national level to
keep the funding crisis in the public eye.
- continue to lobby politicians locally and nationally
- contribute fully to all relevant reviews like ‘21st
Century Social Work'
- continue to be prepared to call for industrial action
up to an including strike action if our members are forced
into unsafe practice because of funding shortages.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
Motion 4 - Proposed New Care Homes
Proposed by George Lee (Social Work) and
Kevin Duguid (Finance)
This meeting welcomes the decision of the City
of Edinburgh Council to commit to building four new care homes
for older people, in response to the business case outlined
within the joint capacity plan (older people's accommodation).
We further note that the two hundred and forty
beds created by these new builds will assist in resolving
delayed discharges from much needed acute hospital beds.
This meeting also welcomes the involvement of
older people in the design of the first of these new homes
through the offices of SAGE.
However, we condemn the Council's proposal to
place management of these new care homes out to competitive
tender thereby potentially placing the care of the older people
in the hands of the lowest bidder, not those best placed to
provide the highest quality of service.
Whilst recognising the need for a mixed economy
within care provision, we remain opposed to profit lead provision.
This meeting resolves to instruct:
- Branch Officers to initiate a broad based campaign of
opposition to the tendering process.
- Branch Officers to seek urgent discussion with the Acting
Director of Social Work to assess which options exist
in relation to retaining the proposed new care homes within
the management of the Council
- Consult those members potentially affected by the Council's
proposals with a view to establish their willingness to
take industrial action in defence of in-house provision.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
Motion 5 - Pay Claim 2006 Onwards
Proposed by John Ross (Housing) and John
Stevenson (Social Work)
This Branch reiterates its policy of campaigning
for a Pay Commission for Scotland to address the long recognised
deep-rooted problems in local government pay.
This Branch also recognises the need to involve
members much more widely in the consultation before any Scottish
pay claim is submitted.
This branch therefore resolved to set up machinery
for workplace meetings, polls, questionnaires and briefings
to run through 2005 to ensure the widest possible involvement
in developing the pay claim and setting the mandate for our
delegates to the national structures.
This AGM recognises the view of many members
that the improvement in low pay is not being funded by councils
but is being funded by limiting the conditions of other workers.
the 2004 pay settlement must deliver real improvement for
all staff.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
Motion 6 - Pay Claim 2006
This Branch believes that the pay claim must
address the low pay in Local Government. The recent pay settlement
based on low percentage annual awards had done little to resolve
this problem.
We also recognise that a claim based solely
on a simple percentage increase is unfavourable to our members
on the lower grades of the pay scale.
We therefore call on UNISON to campaign for
a claim consisting of an annual flat rate of £1,000 or 5%
on each pay point, whichever is the greater.
Decision: Motion fell.
Motion 7 - Joint Trade Union Pay Consultation
This meeting acknowledges the concerns of our
members over the protracted and un-defined consultation period
of the joint trade unions over the current pay deal.
Whilst UNISON carried out a relatively quick
and efficient consultation with its members, both the TGWU
and the GMB's consultation period was significantly longer.
This meeting recognises that every union's consultation
mechanism may differ due to their own rules and constitutions;
however there must be co-ordination of timescales between
the joint trade unions on the completion of consultations.
The failure to do this has merely served to
undermine the position of trade unions within their membership
and within the national bargaining process.
This meeting therefore instructs that:
1.The Scottish Local Government Executive enters
into dialogue with the other joint trade unions to secure
an agreement on co-ordinating jointly and timeously all future
pay and national bargaining consultations.
2. That the terms of this motion are submitted
to the Annual Scottish Local Government Conference.
Decision: On being put to the meeting the terms
of the Motion were AGREED.
At this point of the meeting the Chair advised
the AGM was closed with all remaining motions and vacant Branch
Officers posts being remitted to the Branch Committee for
decision and action.