PLEASE NOTE:
Due to a formatting error,
some motions are missing from the minutes in the
printed AGM booklet. The minutes below and in the
online PDF form of the booklet (right) are the complete
and correct version. Additional copies of the minutes
will be available at the AGM.
............................................................................................................................
MINUTES of BRANCH ANNUAL GENERAL
MEETING
held on 18 FEBRUARY 2008 in the
ASSEMBLY ROOMS, GEORGE STREET,
EDINBURGH
............................................................................................................................
1. OPENING REMARKS/INTRODUCTIONS
The meeting was chaired by the Branch
Chairperson Duncan Smith.
At this point of the meeting the Branch
Communications Officer advised the meeting that
George Lee would not be seeking re-election to the
position of Branch Secretary due to pressures at
work. He thanked George for his efforts and commitment
since the inception of the Branch in 1996 whilst
also recognising his previous involvement in the
partner union NUPE. On behalf of the Branch the
Branch Communications Officer then made a formal
presentation to George.
The presentation was accepted and
George then spoke to the meeting regarding his past
involvement and wishing the Branch all success in
the future.
2. APPOINTMENT OF SCRUTINEERS
Four Scrutineers were appointed -
Walter Weir (Services for Communities), Steve McDonald
(Corporate Services), Gerry Corbett (Health &
Social Care) Irene Heggie (Finance)
3. STANDING ORDERS
The Branch Standing Orders were AGREED
for the following year without amendment.
4. MINUTES OF BRANCH MEETING
2007
The minutes of the last Branch Annual
General meeting of 19th February 2007 and the Special
General Meeting of 17th July 2007 were
AGREED as a correct record with no matters
arising.
5. ANNUAL REPORT 2007
No questions were raised on the Annual
Report.
6. FINANCIAL STATEMENT
The meeting AGREED the financial
statement as detailed in the Annual Report.
7. SPECIAL REPORTS
The meeting received updates on the
ongoing negotiations/discussions on the following
matters:-
- Updated report on Single Status (John Mulgrew)
- Additional Report on Pension Scheme (John
Ross)
- Equal Pay (John Ross)
8. ELECTION OF BRANCH OFFICERS
The undernoted were elected unopposed:
President: John
Stevenson (Children &
Families)
Chairperson: Duncan
Smith (Services for Communities)
Vice-Chairperson Matthew
Creighton (Associated Bodies)
Rose Jackson
(Health & Social
Care)
Secretary: Agnes
Petkevicius (Children &
Families)
Assistant
Secretary: Luke Henderson
(Services for Communities)
Treasurer: Mike
McCrossan (Services for Communities)
Service Conditions Co-ordinator: John
Mulgrew (LVJB)
Service Conditions Convener
(APT&C): John
Ross (Services for Communities)
Service Conditions Convener
(Craft): Walter
Weir (Services for Communities)
Service Conditions Convener
(Manual): Kevin
Duguid (Finance)
Education Officer: Dot
Paterson (Health & Social Care)
Equalities
Officer: Irene Stout
(Services for Communities)
Welfare
Officer: (Job-Share) Gillian
Allan (LVJB)/Mike Smith
(Finance)
International
Officer: Matthew
Creighton (Associated Bodies)
Recruitment/Membership Officer: Irene
Heggie (Finance)
Lifelong Learning Officer: Dot
Paterson (Health & Social Care)
Young Members Officer: Chris
Jeffrey (Corporate Services)
Health & Safety Officer: No
nominations received.
Election required for the following
Branch Officer post(s):
Service Conditions Officer:
The following nominees were elected:
Tom Connolly (Children & Families)
Agnes Petkevicius (Children &
Families)
Irene Stout (Services for Communities)
Elaine Wishart (Corporate Services)
9. RULE CHANGES
No rule changes had been submitted.
10. POLICY MOTIONS
1. Branch Levy
Proposed by John Stevenson (Children
& Families), John Ross (Service for Communities)
This meeting agrees the principle
of establishing a branch levy for the purpose of
supporting members who are involved in Industrial
Action which may be increasingly likely due to a
range of issues including budget cuts, single status,
shared services etc.
We call upon Branch Officers to enter
into discussions with appropriate Regional and National
officials with a view to developing a framework
which would then be the subject of a branch ballot
to establish a local branch levy.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
2. Organising to challenge the
crisis in council jobs and services
Proposed by John Stevenson (Children
and Families) and John Ross (Services for Communities)
This branch believes that there is
an impending crisis for local government jobs and
services and that the specific budget problems in
Edinburgh are a forewarning of potential problems
throughout Scotland.
The effects of this crisis will be
felt by workers in local government but also by
all UNISON members who depend on local services.
These problems arise from
1. A low treasury settlement for
public services.
2. The real cost of PPP/PFI projects
coming home to roost
3. Increases in need and in
duties imposed by the Scottish Government not
being matched by the necessary funding
4. Unrealistic efficiency
targets increased by 25% by the Scottish Government
5. The freeze on council tax
rises which removes the fundamental ability
of councils to take funding decisions based
on local need and local democracy and to respond
to local circumstances
6. The huge shortfall (between
£750 million and £1 billion) between what is
currently spent on local services and what will
be raised by abolishing the council tax and
replacing it with a national tax for local government.
While this not only presents a potential financial
disaster for local services, the tax will also
damage both local and Scottish Parliament democracy
and accountability.
7. A distribution of business
rates that does not reward local investment
in infrastructure. UNISON Scotland fully supports
the return of non-domestic rates to local authority
control. The return of non-domestic rate setting
would increase local democracy and the accountability
of councils.
8. The continuing woeful gap
between Scottish Government funding and the
real cost to councils in providing services
for children and vulnerable adults.
9. A failure to fund the real
costs of Equal Pay and Single Status
10. An approach to Shared
Services which is based on "cheapest is best"
rather than genuinely improved services.
11. While we welcome the removal
of some ring-fenced funding to allow more flexible
local management of resources, this is undermined
by the efficiency saving demands and the inability
to set local taxation levels.
In Edinburgh the situation is
exacerbated by the lack of 'payback' from business
rates from the huge investment in Edinburgh
in infrastructure and other projects to attract
business and investment.
This branch believes UNISON requires
to take a co-ordinated approach to meet these
challenges at local and national level. This
should involve:-
a) A Scotland-wide strategy
that challenges these issues at parliamentary
level, building on the work already done to
get our public services message across to all
political parties
b) Collating the experiences
of branches and, wherever possible, co-ordinating
action against cuts in jobs and services so
that branches are not left isolated.
c) The development of a strategy
that would seek to co-ordinate industrial action
across branches if that becomes necessary.
d) The development of links
at local and national level with user groups
and community organisations
The terms of this motion to be adjusted
as appropriate for submission to Scottish Local
Government Conference.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
3. Defending and Improving
Public Services in Edinburgh
Proposed by Matthew Creighton (Associated
Bodies), Paul Clarke (Services for Communities)
This branch anticipates considerable
challenges in coming years arising from the policies
being pursued by the new political administrations
at Holyrood and at the City Council as well as those
of the UK Treasury. These include:
1. Lack of funding for equal pay
and single status
2. Excessively tight budget
setting driven by inadequate funding for local
government
3. Re-organisations implemented
without sufficient forward funding
4. Rising requirements of statutory
services
5. Freeze on Council Tax rises
and the anticipated gap in funding for the proposed
so-called Local Income Tax'
6. Flawed funding models (PFI,
PPP)
7. Disconnect between infrastructure
needs of the capital city and Business Rates
being administered at Scottish level.
8. Dangers of externalisation
in the Shared Services agenda 9. 2% efficiency
savings target
We recognise that in order to defend
and improve public services and the needs of those
who provide them, we will have to argue through
each of these issues in the public arena. In particular
we recognise that with relatively new administrations
and councillors/MSPs at Edinburgh and Scottish levels,
we should devote more effort to systematic lobbying
of our elected representatives.
We recognise that we will need to
organise more joint campaigns with service users
and public campaigns, and applaud the establishment
of the Social Care Campaign; and the regular and
effective use of media relations by the Branch.
We instruct the incoming Secretary
and Branch Committee to prepare plans to systematically
take UNISON's message to elected representatives
in Edinburgh through the mobilisation of members,
stewards and officers to lobby them on a case by
case basis. This will involve training programmes,
briefing materials, co-ordination and regular review.
We call on UNISON Labour Link to work
with and within the Labour Party around defence
of services and strategies for proper funding of
public services delivered by public services.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
14. Shared Services
Proposed by John Mulgrew (Lothian
Valuation Joint Board), Elaine Wishart (Corporate
Services)
This Branch notes with concern that
the Council's Shared Service Agenda will have a
major impact on Member's working conditions and
job security. Under Council proposals to re-organise
Admin/Clerical, Home Based Services and Procurement
into cross Council single units there could be almost
500 job losses.
We call upon Branch Officers to co-ordinate
working groups and negotiating frameworks across
the affected areas once proposals are brought forward
by Council.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
Emergency Motion
A. Council Budget
Proposed by John Ross (Services
for Communities) and John Stevenson (Children &
Families)
This meeting supports the actions
of Branch Officers in organising a demonstration
in Parliament Square on Thursday 21st February at
which time the Council will be deliberating its
budget for the next three years.
We view the involvement of the Scottish
Government through their insistence Grant levels
must be underpinned by a freeze on Council Tax increases
as removing local democratic accountability and
the right of local politicians to determine the
level of services.
This will impact on staffing levels
with an increasing number of posts being lost and
on services which are of fundamental importance
to many of the most vulnerable in society.
We note the Branch Committee has already
raised these concerns through UNISON's Scottish
structures and instruct them to continue such a
campaign.
In the short-term the Branch should
make representations to the council meeting on 21st
February 2008 to express our concerns and to reiterate
the branch position that any single or collective
Compulsory Redundancy situation would leave us no
option other than to embark on a programme of Industrial
Action.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
4. Cuts to Home Care services
for adults
Proposed by Mary McCrea (Health
& Social Care), Marlyn Tweedie (Health &
Social Care)
This AGM notes that in August '07,
Edinburgh Council were forced to retreat from their
threat of closing 22 schools after an inspiring
and determined campaign. In September '07 a drastic
cuts package in the Health and Social Care department
has been implemented as a way of "balancing the
books".
These cuts significantly attack the
resources and services available to support the
frail and disabled to remain in their own homes
with dignity.
As council social care workers, who
are committed to providing quality services, we
condemn this attack on our services and jobs. It
Means:
- Care at home restricted to those who meet
critical criteria or hospital discharge. Once
seen as not being critical, the service is withdrawn.
- Only one hot meal per day - frozen mean -
30 mins allocated.
- Increasing charges for services
- A new Care Home built by the department now
run by a private company
- A general rundown of Home Care services and
more going to private agencies.
Since these cuts have been implemented,
staff are under even more pressure to provide a
service which is rushed, leaving service users with
less choice and a service that only maintains a
basic level of care.
In December '07, in keeping with UNISON
policy, a public campaign against these measures
was initiated. This will continue until our department
and the Council take our concerns seriously and
rethink their budget policy.
We ask this AGM to
1. Support this campaign
2. Calls for an opposition to
cuts and privatisation
3. Encourage maximum involvement
from UNISON members and members of the public.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
5. 2008/2009 Pay Claim
Proposed by Ian Hood (Health &
Social Care), Duncan Smith (Services for Communities)
1 This branch notes
1. The submission of the 2008-2009
Scottish local government pay claim for £1,000
or 5%, whichever is the greater. 2. The plans
by Gordon Brown's government to cap public sector
and in particular local government workers'
pay rises to less than 2%. 3. That there is
no shortage of money for bailing out Northern
Rock (so far £50 billion - half the cost of
the entire NHS).
2 The branch believes this our
claim is reasonable given
1. That real inflation
is at the level of 4 to 4.5% per year and
2. That annual pay settlements
allow more flexibility for changing circumstances,
particularly given the unsettled economy
and the "credit crunch".
3. This pay claim is winnable
if we win the membership to an active support
for the claim.
3 This branch resolves to
1. Produce a regular series
of bulletins and newsletter informing members
of claim and the reasons for support.
2. Produce a new section of the Branch website
with campaign information.
3. Regularly issue pay claim information by
email to branch members and activists.
4. Organise a range of members meetings and
support stewards to organise workplace meetings
briefing members on the pay claim.
Amendment: Proposed by John
Ross (Services for Communities), John Stevenson
(Children & Families).
"Delete point 2.2 and renumber the
remaining clauses."
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion as amended were
AGREED.
Emergency Motion (C) Pay Offer
2008
Proposed by John Ross (Services
for Communities) and Irene Stout (Services for Communities)
This meeting supports the decision
of the Scottish Local Government Committee to reject
the derisory three year pay offer as tabled by the
Employers at the Scottish Joint Council and note
UNISON's rejection has been supported by all unions
party to the claim.
The pay offer was framed round increases
of 2.2% (2008/09), 2.3% (2009/2010) and 2.2% (2010/2011).
We note this issue is on the agenda for the next
meeting of the Scottish Joint Council.
If there is no movement in the offer
at that time we call upon our negotiators to withdraw
from further discussions and to immediately put
in place the required processes for an Industrial
Action ballot.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED
Emergency Motions (B) Revised
Local Government Pension Scheme
Proposed by John Stevenson (Children
& Families) and John Ross (Services for Communities)
This meeting recognises continuation
of the Local Government Pension Scheme in its current
format is not sustainable due to the increasing
number of recipients. We note a full ballot of Local
Government employees will take place between 3rd
March 2008 and 21st March on the terms of the revised
scheme.
We congratulate our negotiators who,
during a period when many schemes are changing with
real detriment for contributors, have achieved real
improvements with those principally being:-
- retention of the final salary element
- movement to 60ths rather than 80ths (i.e.
full pension rights after 30 years rather than
40 years)
- pension benefits open to all partners and
not limited solely to spouses
- more open access to ill-health pensions
- a graduated payment scheme which ensures members
earning less than £24,000 (approx) will pay
less than current levels, between £24, 000 and
£27,000 (approx) will pay the same as now with
those earning more than £27,000 (approx) paying
marginally more. This will benefit over 60%
of staff with particular focus on the low-paid.
- Protection of Rule of 85 until 2020.
We call upon Branch Officers to support
the negotiators' recommendation for acceptance of
the revised scheme and to take measures to ensure
the widest opportunity for members to participate
in the forthcoming ballot.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
Emergency Motion (D) UNISON Subscriptions
Banding
Proposed by Kevin Duguid (Finance)
and Walter Weir (Services for Communities)
This Branch notes with concern that
UNISON staff are acting outwith the terms of the
Rule Book in relation to the calculation of subscription
bands and any subsequent refunds of overpaid subs
by including casual overtime payments.
National Rules have always applied
the principle that only contractual enhancements
should be included in the calculation of subs banding.
Experience demonstrates members have been denied
a refund of overpaid subs, this is wholly unacceptable
and therefore this branch resolves to:
1. Press UNISON nationally
for our members to be refunded their overpaid
subs in full.
2. Take forward an appropriately
worded motion to National Delegate Conference
2008 to ensure that this issue is clarified
once and for all.
3. Issue letters to our affected
members advising them of the Branch's position
and intended action.
Decision: On being put to the
meeting the terms of the Motion were AGREED.
At this point of the meeting the
Chair advised the AGM was closed with all remaining
motions and vacant Branch Officers posts being remitted
to the Branch Committee for consideration.