The
Crisis in Childrens Services
EDINBURGH INQUIRY REPORT - COLLECTIVE GRIEVANCE
This is the appeal submission in the Social Work Childrens Service
Grievance. The Council agreed to make a clear statement about
the risks staff work with, make a joint approach to the Scottish
Executive for more funding and called for further reports from
the Director. The Council also made a total of £2 million
more available for placements over two years.
1. THE INITIAL GRIEVANCE
This grievance was lodged on behalf of UNISON members involved
in the provision of Childrens Services in the Department of
Social Work and was focussed on the failure of the Department
and the Council to allocate the resources necessary to ensure
the first four recommendations of the Edinburgh Inquiry are
fully met.
2. THE CURRENT POSITION
2.1 There have been constructive discussions between
UNISON and the Director of Social Work at Stage 2 of the procedure.
Those discussions identified a number of Departmental issues
which could be addressed to more effectively work towards achieving
the aims and principles of the Edinburgh Inquiry recommendations.
2.2 UNISON is satisfied that the issues acted upon in
the short term, and further proposals and discussions in the
longer term, reflect a genuine attempt by the Department to
address elements of the grievance.
2.3 However, we have now reached a point where UNISON
believes that there are still outstanding issues in the grievance
which the Department is unable to address. These refer to:
a) the Corporate Responsibility of the Council
in terms of Childrens Services and the recommendations of
the Edinburgh Inquiry
b) the allocation of resources necessary
to fulfill the Council's commitment to implement the recommendations
of the Edinburgh Inquiry.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EDINBURGH INQUIRY
UNISON believes that a full resolution to its grievance on
the following first four recommendations of the Edinburgh Inquiry
has not been met:-
1. The Council as a whole should explicitly acknowledge
its corporate responsibility for children looked after by them
and its determination to ensure that this is fully reflected
in policy formulation and practice.
2. The Council should publicly acknowledge their acceptance
that there are risks involved both in keeping children in the
community and in looking after them, and should ensure that
its professional staff feel supported in implementing decisions
arising from risk assessments.
3. The Council, through the Chief Executive, should
devise a comprehensive care strategy which recognises residential
care as part of a continuum.
It should draw on the expertise of all departments
of the Council and should include a clear strategy for community
based support for children and young people in order to avoid
inappropriate use of residential resources. Residential care
must be used and available where it is a positive choice for
young people.
4. Provision of residential units must be at such a
level as to allow a genuine choice of placements to best meet
the needs of young people. In implementing this recommendation,
the Council must accept that this will require units to operate
at times at less than maximum capacity.
4. FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1. The Social Work Department has not provided enough
residential resources to avoid 'inappropriate use', to fulfill
the aim of 'positive choice' or to allow 'a genuine choice'
for most children. Large numbers of children are assessed as
needing residential provision and it cannot be provided. Edinburgh
was once proud of its record on ensuring under 12's were not
placed, except in exceptional circumstances, in residential
care. However, currently children under 12 are placed in units
which were not designed for this purpose.
4.2. The first available place, rather than a 'matched'
resource is the criteria for placement in most cases. Some reports
suggest between 10 and 20 young people are waiting for a care
placement at any given time and a similar number are inappropriately
placed. Funding has not been available to meet the needs of
young people who require the specific resources of units outwith
the authority. The authority has no provision for residential
schooling for girls.
4.3. The number of residential resources since the
Edinburgh Inquiry have reduced while demand has been maintained
or increased.
4.4 The pressure on resources has a cumulative effect.
The absence of, for example, residential school or foster placements
results in other units being 'log-jammed', thereby undermining
the issues of 'positive' and 'genuine' choice. This sometimes
leads to children assessed as needing a placement having no
placement at all.
4.5. The Department is unable to meet its commitments
in these areas due to a lack of financial resources provided
by the Council. All this leads to an inadequate service for
children.
5. EFFECTS ON STAFF MEMBERS
5.1 These issues lead to staff facing intolerable pressures
and experiencing the stress of trying to manage avoidable risk
in the absence of an appropriate resource.
5.2 They lead to very low morale in the service and a crisis
in recruitment and retention of staff.
5.3 Staff feel that the circumstances they find themselves
in can lead to a compromising of professional standards and
acceptable child care policy.
5.4 Especially in light of the future registration of Social
Work professionals, staff are concerned about the effects on
their professional practice and ultimately their employment.
6. RESOLUTION OF THE GRIEVANCE
The resolution to this grievance lies both in the planning
and implementation of interim and long term strategies.
6.1 Interim Measures
a) The Council requires to recognise this as a corporate
issue and the Chief Executive's Management Team should bring
forward an appropriate package of additional resources to allow
immediate problems to be addressed in line with the Edinburgh
Inquiry recommendations which the Council accepted, especially
in relation to provision for under 12's.
b) The Council should make an explicit statement of
support for staff who require to work with risk on a daily basis.
This should explicitly recognise the additional stresses created
by resource pressures.
c) The Council should maintain its position, with the
funding to make it a reality, that posts in Childrens Services
should be exempt from any 'performance factor' in terms of filling
of vacancies.
d) The Council should recognise that current staffing
levels are inadequate to maintain a stable and consistent service.
It should authorise a review of staffing levels and make the
necessary resources available to fulfill the principles of the
Edinburgh Inquiry.
e) The Council should make provision immediately available
to the Social Work Department to address the issue of inappropriately
placed under-twelves and other inappopriately placed young people
- and for young people assessed as requiring residential school
or foster care placements.
f) The Council should appoint an appropriate official
for an initial 12 month period to oversee and co-ordinate the
response to this grievance. Resources should be made available
for the necessary technology and information systems to allow
such an officer to audit, project and assess future needs and
the resources required to meet those needs
g) An injection of emergency funds is required to address
the immediate crisis. The Council should therefore join with
CoSLA (recognising that the problem is shared with other local
authorities) and UNISON to make representations to the Scottish
Executive for such funds at this point, pending the implementation
of a longer term strategy.
6.2 Longer Term Measures
a) The Council requires to join with other interested
parties in calling on the Scottish Executive to recognise the
crisis which exists in Social Work and seeking an independent
inquiry of Social Work services across Scotland. The Inquiry
would replicate the Scottish Executive's work in relation to
Education.
b) the Council requires to make sufficient funding
available to fulfill recommendations 3 and 4 in its own financial
planning.
c) To build on 5.2(g) above, the Council should join
with other interested parties to lobby the Scottish Executive
in terms of a longer term strategic funding.
top
|