UNISON Deputation to City of Edinburgh Council
Meeting 16/10/03 On the Inquiry into the death of Caleb
Ness.
John Stevenson, Branch Secretary, UNISON City
of Edinburgh Branch
Let me say first that it is with immense sadness
that UNISON comes with this deputation today. Before I say anything
else, I think it is important to let you, and the public know
how social workers - and indeed many staff and managers throughout
the Council - have been feeling about the awful death of Caleb
Ness.
Those feelings freely expressed to me over the
last week and much longer are of shock, despair, heart-searching,
some anger and some utter disbelief and despondency. I've seen
many tears in the last week. You need to know that those most
directly involved who I've spoken to, have not been thinking
about themselves, despite their predicament and despite the
media frenzy. Their first thought has been about Caleb and they
will live with that.
It is in the nature of social work that we all
feel responsible, no matter how close or distant we were from
the events. That is because - in the face of constant vilification,
of relatively poor pay and constant pressures - social workers
do the job because they care about children and want to protect
them. Why ever else, after the last few days, would they want
do the job?
Some of you may know that, while I do some trade
union duties, I am first and foremost a social worker and proud
of it.
In 23 years I have thankfully not lost a child
my team was responsible for and hope I never will. That is,
I hope, down to good practice and excellent support - but it
is also and very largely due to sheer luck. Because, although
the Inquiry says this death was avoidable, not all deaths will
be avoidable or predictable and the dividing line can be very
very thin.
Social workers deal with risk, day in day out.
Risk means things will sometimes go tragically wrong. This is
a fact recognised by this Council in its statement after the
Edinburgh Inquiry and in its response to social workers' collective
grievance about lack of resources.
UNISON is not here to defend bad practice. But
we are not here either to collude with a frenzied search for
scapegoats. We are certainly not here to give any credibility
to the disgraceful antics of some of the media as they shamelessly
whip up anger and witchhunts.
We have never criticised the media's right to
publish things we might not like to see but we believe the way
some have handled this has been sensational, irresponsible and
indefensible.
I know this Council today will be far above jumping
to pressure campaigns. You are the Council, you represent the
people of Edinburgh, you make the decisions, not the media.
But we are here to set a context for you. A context
where staff, not just in Edinburgh - but around Scotland - are
under so much pressure that they fear making mistakes they would
not normally make. In many situations they just cannot fulfil
the procedures and standards they want and need to achieve.
Yes, they want to be challenged, they want to
be held to account, but to do their job they need support and
they need a mature understanding of the risks they manage on
a daily basis. And sometimes politicians will need to stand
up and say that, no matter what the media agenda is.
And it takes the courage to approach the issues
addressed by the inquiry with a mature reflection, a calm analysis
and a genuine programme to do all that can be done to minimise
the risk of something like this arising again.
That we believe will take continuity. That will
take leadership and that will need to avoid any unnecessary
instability at this crucial stage of the process.
That is why UNISON cannot support calls for the
resignation of Cllr Thomas whose record in understanding social
work issues and in actually delivering new resources is unparalleled.
No other administration in Lothian or Edinburgh
since 1979 has delivered such a level of inflation-plus increase
to children's services. Most - and I include Labour, Lib Dem
and Conservative and even one SNP budget - have actually
delivered cuts over the years which children's services are
still struggling to recover from.
That is also why we could not support the resignation
of the Director, Les McEwan. It is a testament to the integrity
of the man that shines high above those who have bayed for his
blood, that he has even considered this course of action.
But it is not a decision we'd welcome. We believe
that his knowledge, his skills, his strength, his energy and
his commitment to children would be a powerful force to bring
us through this crisis and ultimately better protect children.
We understand and support him personally in whatever decision
he makes, but we do not share the view that it is the best thing
for Social Work and for children in Edinburgh.
If it takes his resignation to call off the vilification
of our members and their department, then there is a very shallow
understanding of what needs to be addressed. In fact there is
no understanding, just a lust for blame.
There are also technical implications arising
from the way things have been handled.
Where will we be in any future inquiry of
any kind if people, who give the best of what they can honestly
give to it, are aware that all they might be doing is setting
themselves up for disciplinary or other action?
Where do we all stand if the inquiry did not
call all the witnesses it might have before drawing some
of its conclusions? What happens if disciplinary procedures
call witnesses who further clarify some of the evidence
to the inquiry? What if that is in conflict with the Inquiry?
How in heaven's name do already understaffed
teams cope with key individuals being moved away from them?
Even more reason for calm reflection and analysis.
I started on a social worker note and I'll finish
on one.
I'll tell you about just a few of the hundreds
of children our social work colleagues have saved from death
or serious injury over recent years. I've changed and merged
some of the details for reasons of confidentiality.
The baby with a fractured skull they rescued
from a house on one of the twice-daily visits they were
doing because they had sought, but had been refused, a place
of safety order.
The 3-year-old they took to hospital outwith
procedures (and possibly the law) because they suspected
injuries and found healing fractured ribs and limbs - if
they had been wrong they would have faced disciplinary or
even legal action - but because their hunch was right, all
that was forgotten.
The child they took turns to take out during
the day and at weekends and bought in private care for because
she was on a Child Protection Order but they had no foster
parents in the whole of the Lothians to care for her. Not
an easily resolved resource issue, just a fact of life.
The busy and harassed duty and emergency social workers
who were alert enough to spot and expose an evolving group
of sex offenders and removed a child from risk.
The young woman who phoned last month to tell
about the success of her own new family and had the generosity
to thank us for identifying and removing her from the awful
abuse she had suffered as a child.
Caleb Ness's death - as the inquiry says - was
avoidable. But remember too that that judgement came from a
range of issues across all of the agencies involved - only 8
out of 35 recommendations apply only to Social Work and many
of them were already existing practice - yet always it seems
the sword falls just on the social workers.
But every day social workers across Edinburgh
and Scotland are protecting hundreds of children - over 300
on the register in Edinburgh and many many more at a level of
risk below the register threshold.
Not just protecting, but also working with children
so they can recover, re-find their childhood and reach their
potential. And doing that very often despite the lack of resources
and supports available to them.
That is not just an Edinburgh issue, it is a Scotland-wide
issue and it is not enough for the Scottish Executive to make
demands, to rattle out sound bites about getting tough with
Councils and staff - it must finance the children's services
it says it aspires to.
As I stand here, there are Children & Families
Social Workers throughout Scotland - about 170 of them for Edinburgh's
almost half million population - who are protecting children,
who will do that tomorrow and into the future.
They were certainly doing it with me up to 10pm
on Monday night and with a colleague later on Tuesday when,
incidentally another agency firmly told us they were finishing
at 6. They were doing it to 9pm last Thursday night - all after
an 8.30am start.
We all have to think about the tragedy today.
We all have to think hard about the inquiry today. You have
to think about how we will ensure standards of practice and
monitor them - our members have no fears from that and they
welcome it if it will bring them the real tools to do the job
and a real understanding of their job.
But you also have to think about the morale of
these workers and at least do something to make them feel supported
in the job they do for you and for Edinburgh. We cannot afford
a climate where they will leave, or where the current recruitment
crisis across Scotland gets any worse.
That, if I can reiterate again, requires the anger
to be put to one side, the drive for scapegoats to be put on
hold, and real efforts made in an atmosphere of calm and considered
reflection.
Thank you for hearing this deputation.
top