The Crisis in Childrens
Services
EDINBURGH INQUIRY REPORT - COLLECTIVE GRIEVANCE
This is the appeal submission in the Social
Work Childrens Service Grievance. The Council
agreed to make a clear statement about the risks
staff work with, make a joint approach to the
Scottish Executive for more funding and called
for further reports from the Director. The Council
also made a total of £2 million more available
for placements over two years.
1. THE INITIAL GRIEVANCE
This grievance was lodged on behalf of
UNISON members involved in the provision of
Childrens Services in the Department of Social
Work and was focussed on the failure of the
Department and the Council to allocate the
resources necessary to ensure the first four
recommendations of the Edinburgh Inquiry are
fully met.
2. THE CURRENT POSITION
2.1 There have been constructive
discussions between UNISON and the Director
of Social Work at Stage 2 of the procedure.
Those discussions identified a number of Departmental
issues which could be addressed to more effectively
work towards achieving the aims and principles
of the Edinburgh Inquiry recommendations.
2.2 UNISON is satisfied that the issues
acted upon in the short term, and further
proposals and discussions in the longer term,
reflect a genuine attempt by the Department
to address elements of the grievance.
2.3 However, we have now reached
a point where UNISON believes that there are
still outstanding issues in the grievance
which the Department is unable to address.
These refer to:
a) the Corporate Responsibility
of the Council in terms of Childrens Services
and the recommendations of the Edinburgh
Inquiry
b) the allocation of resources
necessary to fulfill the Council's commitment
to implement the recommendations of the
Edinburgh Inquiry.
3. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EDINBURGH INQUIRY
UNISON believes that a full resolution
to its grievance on the following first four
recommendations of the Edinburgh Inquiry has
not been met:-
1. The Council as a whole should
explicitly acknowledge its corporate responsibility
for children looked after by them and its
determination to ensure that this is fully
reflected in policy formulation and practice.
2. The Council should publicly acknowledge
their acceptance that there are risks involved
both in keeping children in the community
and in looking after them, and should ensure
that its professional staff feel supported
in implementing decisions arising from risk
assessments.
3. The Council, through the Chief
Executive, should devise a comprehensive care
strategy which recognises residential care
as part of a continuum.
It should draw on the expertise of
all departments of the Council and should
include a clear strategy for community based
support for children and young people in order
to avoid inappropriate use of residential
resources. Residential care must be used and
available where it is a positive choice for
young people.
4. Provision of residential units
must be at such a level as to allow a genuine
choice of placements to best meet the needs
of young people. In implementing this recommendation,
the Council must accept that this will require
units to operate at times at less than maximum
capacity.
4. FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1. The Social Work Department has
not provided enough residential resources
to avoid 'inappropriate use', to fulfill the
aim of 'positive choice' or to allow 'a genuine
choice' for most children. Large numbers of
children are assessed as needing residential
provision and it cannot be provided. Edinburgh
was once proud of its record on ensuring under
12's were not placed, except in exceptional
circumstances, in residential care. However,
currently children under 12 are placed in
units which were not designed for this purpose.
4.2. The first available place, rather
than a 'matched' resource is the criteria
for placement in most cases. Some reports
suggest between 10 and 20 young people are
waiting for a care placement at any given
time and a similar number are inappropriately
placed. Funding has not been available to
meet the needs of young people who require
the specific resources of units outwith the
authority. The authority has no provision
for residential schooling for girls.
4.3. The number of residential resources
since the Edinburgh Inquiry have reduced while
demand has been maintained or increased.
4.4 The pressure on resources
has a cumulative effect. The absence of, for
example, residential school or foster placements
results in other units being 'log-jammed',
thereby undermining the issues of 'positive'
and 'genuine' choice. This sometimes leads
to children assessed as needing a placement
having no placement at all.
4.5. The Department is unable to
meet its commitments in these areas due to
a lack of financial resources provided by
the Council. All this leads to an inadequate
service for children.
5. EFFECTS ON STAFF MEMBERS
5.1 These issues lead to staff facing
intolerable pressures and experiencing the
stress of trying to manage avoidable risk
in the absence of an appropriate resource.
5.2 They lead to very low morale in the
service and a crisis in recruitment and retention
of staff.
5.3 Staff feel that the circumstances
they find themselves in can lead to a compromising
of professional standards and acceptable child
care policy.
5.4 Especially in light of the future
registration of Social Work professionals,
staff are concerned about the effects on their
professional practice and ultimately their
employment.
6. RESOLUTION OF THE GRIEVANCE
The resolution to this grievance lies both
in the planning and implementation of interim
and long term strategies.
6.1 Interim Measures
a) The Council requires to recognise
this as a corporate issue and the Chief Executive's
Management Team should bring forward an appropriate
package of additional resources to allow immediate
problems to be addressed in line with the
Edinburgh Inquiry recommendations which the
Council accepted, especially in relation to
provision for under 12's.
b) The Council should make an explicit
statement of support for staff who require
to work with risk on a daily basis. This should
explicitly recognise the additional stresses
created by resource pressures.
c) The Council should maintain its
position, with the funding to make it a reality,
that posts in Childrens Services should be
exempt from any 'performance factor' in terms
of filling of vacancies.
d) The Council should recognise that
current staffing levels are inadequate to
maintain a stable and consistent service.
It should authorise a review of staffing levels
and make the necessary resources available
to fulfill the principles of the Edinburgh
Inquiry.
e) The Council should make provision
immediately available to the Social Work Department
to address the issue of inappropriately placed
under-twelves and other inappopriately placed
young people - and for young people assessed
as requiring residential school or foster
care placements.
f) The Council should appoint an appropriate
official for an initial 12 month period to
oversee and co-ordinate the response to this
grievance. Resources should be made available
for the necessary technology and information
systems to allow such an officer to audit,
project and assess future needs and the resources
required to meet those needs
g) An injection of emergency funds
is required to address the immediate crisis.
The Council should therefore join with CoSLA
(recognising that the problem is shared with
other local authorities) and UNISON to make
representations to the Scottish Executive
for such funds at this point, pending the
implementation of a longer term strategy.
6.2 Longer Term Measures
a) The Council requires to join with
other interested parties in calling on the
Scottish Executive to recognise the crisis
which exists in Social Work and seeking an
independent inquiry of Social Work services
across Scotland. The Inquiry would replicate
the Scottish Executive's work in relation
to Education.
b) the Council requires to make sufficient
funding available to fulfill recommendations
3 and 4 in its own financial planning.
c) To build on 5.2(g) above, the
Council should join with other interested
parties to lobby the Scottish Executive in
terms of a longer term strategic funding.
top
|